Conversation with Cruisin

Categories: Pointless Criticism * Sexism

[After someone decided to post my Conversations With Jerks site as hilariously pathetic on a popular website, I started getting dozens of e-mails and IMs per day from people who were either out to lecture me about its pointlessness or people who posed as assholes trying really hard to get on the site. Here is one of the lecture e-mails.]

From: Cruisin
To: Ivy
Subj: ur site

What a weird site. What's wrong with you? You act way over sophisticated and it's just annoying. Get a grip on life and stop being an uptight woman. I think you mistake independence with isolation. :)

Sincerely,
A concerned Human


From: Ivy
To: Cruisin

Erm...in case you can't read, I'm acting intentionally "bitchy" to the people who IM me, because I DON'T LIKE THEM. I really don't appreciate you coming out of the blue to try and tell me how to change to be acceptable to your standards when you're basing your beliefs about me on a website whose purpose you seem to have overlooked.

If you'd like to assume that you have me figured out and that I'm a sad, "isolated" individual because I played hoity-toity with sex-scrounging fiends, perhaps you should re-examine your position and realize that you've just sent an insulting mail to someone you don't even know.

~*~iVY


From: Cruisin
To: Ivy

Hey, never said you were sad, but I never really based any beliefs of yourself in my head. I didn't really think twice about what my standards were. Frankly, I don't know what you expect when you put your IM conversation's on a web site. Do you expect everyone to agree with your beliefs? What you are putting on your site is your belief on the people that IM you, don't be hypocrytical. And frankly, if I wanted your opinion on my "insulting" e-mail, I would have given it to you. Have a nice day :)

Sincerely,
A concerned individual


From: Ivy
To: Cruisin

I didn't really think twice about what my standards were.

Heh, I could tell, from the amount of completely off-the-cuff b.s. spewing onto the screen.

Frankly, I don't know what you expect when you put your IM conversation's on a web site. Do you expect everyone to agree with your beliefs? What you are putting on your site is your belief on the people that IM you, don't be hypocrytical.

What does putting my IMs on a site have to do with beliefs? No "beliefs" are represented by my honest cataloging of real IMs that have happened to me. Where does it say when I post IMs that I expect everyone to agree with my beliefs? And you say that I'm putting on my site "the belief on people that IM me," but there is no "belief" about them. They are just displayed as they ARE. If you are trying to say I voice my opinions about the people by posting them, that is a true statement, but I see nothing hypocritical about it. It seems you don't quite have the language skills to explain to me how you came to your conclusion, though, so don't bother.

And frankly, if I wanted your opinion on my "insulting" e-mail, I would have given it to you.

That also makes no sense, "frankly." You can't give me my opinion. But apparently you want to try.

If you actually have a problem with any part of my site, feel free to voice it in a constructive and specific fashion, but don't just come out of nowhere blathering about how I'm hypocritical because I post conversations with jerks and show everyone what I think of them. It doesn't show that you're "a concerned individual"; it just shows that you don't even know what "hypocritical" means.


From: Cruisin
To: Ivy

Why do you feel the need to break up and analyze everything I write to you? You don't seem to have even the closest grasp of what i'm saying. Plain and simple, I own you, there is nothing more to say about it. It's as clear as day, I own you. YOu can try and deny it but it's a fact. You seriously need to sit back and think about the things you are writing back to me, you sound like a moron. To you, it may sound and look like "good language skills" but to me it's complete BS. I don't care about good language skills, it really doesn't make a difference to me or should to you how I write. Maybe if I was writing a mid-term or soemthing along those lines, I would put forth an effort to grammar, but I'm not and neither are you so drop the grammar and language crap.

On your site, you post IM's from people that you see to be random morons that want a piece of ass. Maybe they do, who cares is the point. I stumbled upon your site and thought it was the biggest waste of time for someone to come up with. Maybe to "sophisticated" persons like yourself it makes sense, but I guess I am not sophisticated. You say on your site that you do not like these people and you assume what they instant messaged you for. That is your belief, plain and simple. Why are you entitled to write your belief on anyone, but I am not? That is hypocritical. I never said you weren't entitled to yours, so why I not entitled to my opinion or beliefs on you? So, break up and analyze this e-mail some and then get back to me. Until then I own you, have a nice day :)

Sincerely,
Ur mother


From: Ivy
To: Cruisin

Why do you feel the need to break up and analyze everything I write to you?

No "need" to do it. Just wanted to, because you came out of nowhere (much like my IMs) and informed me that because you were not amused by my site, you a) think I'm hypocritical for unknown reasons, b) think it's a big waste of time but still bother to e-mail me about it instead of looking only at "worthy" content, and c) own me.

I own you. YOu can try and deny it but it's a fact.

Honestly I'm not sure what people are trying to express if they say they "own" me, but claiming ownership of me doesn't change the fact that nothing you've said has been properly justified, which means that in term paper language, you are making premature assumptions and therefore coming to erroneous conclusions, whether you insist you own me or not.

You seriously need to sit back and think about the things you are writing back to me, you sound like a moron. To you, it may sound and look like "good language skills" but to me it's complete BS.

Maybe I should clue you in: I don't have to make a special effort to write with "good language skills." I get this a lot from people who either don't understand big words or are mad because my using specific language to describe and properly support my opinions is a foreign concept to them. They would rather just say "Yeah, well...you suck, so HA HA I win, yer momma, I own you cuz I sed so." Sound familiar? We may both sound like "morons" to each other, sure, but I'm telling you why I feel the way I do, while you are content to just say a couple of juvenile equivalents of "nuh uh."

Maybe if I was writing a mid-term or soemthing along those lines, I would put forth an effort to grammar, but I'm not and neither are you so drop the grammar and language crap.

As if I write in "good grammar" to make some kind of point. No, I just DO, because it is more effective. When people don't understand it, their first reaction is just slapping me with a "you're just trying to make yourself look smart, you bitch" insult. Sorry, you aren't fooling anyone.

I stumbled upon your site and thought it was the biggest waste of time for someone to come up with.

If you're so appalled that my site has wasted your time, it hardly makes sense to give MORE of your time to such a criminal as myself. It would make a lot more sense to just shrug, judge me as having no life, and leave me alone. And if you're criticizing me because *I* wasted *my* time on it, you've got a warped perception of it, because I don't spend that much time on the page. I've just been spending a small amount of time on it now and then for many years.

You say on your site that you do not like these people and you assume what they instant messaged you for. That is your belief, plain and simple. Why are you entitled to write your belief on anyone, but I am not? That is hypocritical.

I don't have to "assume" anything that they instant messaged me for, dear. When they ask me to have sex with them, only then do I believe that's what they want. Where did you get the idea that I assume everyone who IMs me is a cyber fiend? There is no "belief" involved here. And yes, it would be quite hypocritical for me to say that I can state my belief on someone but you cannot. Which is why I'd really like you to find where I've said such a thing, since I never have and you'd have to make it up. Lying to make me seem like a hypocrite doesn't exactly prove me a hypocrite, nor does totally misunderstanding the purpose of my site or my beliefs about anyone on it.

Feel free to e-mail me back more comments about owning my pathetic pointless-page-making ass, but picking your language apart for you has become a bit tiresome, so if you prove yourself unworthy of my attention, I may be forced to give up and judge you as a lost cause. Can you feel the love?


From: Cruisin
To: Ivy

And yes, it would be quite hypocritical for me to say that I can state my belief on someone but you cannot. Which is why I'd really like you to find where I've said such a thing, since I never have and you'd have to make it up.

It seems you don't quite have the language skills to explain to me how you came to your conclusion, so don't bother.


To: Cruisin
From: Ivy

It seems you don't quite have the language skills to explain to me how you came to your conclusion, so don't bother.

So...you quote something I said that still does nothing to prove the assertion you made about me. Nowhere in that statement does it say that you shouldn't tell me whatever you want...it just said it seemed you didn't have the language skills to state a supported opinion of any kind, so I didn't really care to see you try. It seems that's still true. Listen, you accused me of having a website that is a waste of time and told me I was uptight and that there was something wrong with me, and you seemed to think this kind of behavior is okay, that you can just do that to people and not expect them to ask you to justify what you said. When I asked for justification, all I got was more crap, and it's now continued to happen with no sign of slowing. I don't really wanna argue with you about something if your little insults don't even have basis in reality, for Pete's sake, whoever Pete is. You can e-mail me back if you actually have something to say, but at this point my feeling is that this is pointless.

~*~*iVY

[And I think he agreed, because he did not come back.]


Comment on this loser!

Any comments left here are PUBLIC. If you are not comfortable with that, mail me directly.

Name:
Email address:
Which jerk?
(Please don't leave "which jerk" blank. This is an all-purpose form for all the jerks.)
Comments:


Comments from others:

None yet.


[All Conversations With Assholes]